• Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Courts
  • International/Regional
  • Opinions
Monday, March 1, 2021
  • Login
Paid Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Courts
  • International/Regional
  • Opinions
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Courts
  • International/Regional
  • Opinions
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Paid Advertisement
Home Politics

Lincoln Lewis blames David Granger for the failed Elections Petition

Staff Reporter by Staff Reporter
January 21, 2021
in Politics
0
New Project T

New Project T

0
SHARES
886
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Editor

Paid Advertisement

Daily News– Veteran Trade Unionist, Lincoln Lewis is blaming former President, David Granger for the Elections Petition which was thrown out by the High Court on Monday last.

Chief Justice, Roxanne George-Wiltshire on Monday threw out one of the petitions brought by the Coalition which challenged the results of the March 2, 2020 Elections.

The Coalition brought two Elections Petition to the High Court challenging the results of March 2, 2020, General and Regional Elections. One of those petitions, Petition 99, challenges the results of the elections and the other is challenging Order 66 or the National Recount Order.

“With regards to the Petition that was thrown out by the High Court, David Granger must be held accountable for not signing the writ on the date he received it. This notwithstanding, the question that needs to be answered is whether it is just for a matter to be thrown out for the alleged late serving on a minor party (i.e. Granger) when the major party ( i.e. GECOM) was served timely,” Lewis noted.

The statement by Lewis came two days after Attorney General and Minister of Legal Affairs, Anil Nandlall SC, also shed blame on the APNU+AFC for failing in their own efforts to file the petitions properly.

Mr. Granger was served on September 25, 2020, outside the timeframe stipulated for him to be served. The Party then served a supplementary affidavit on Mr. Granger stating that he was served on time, but a later date was singed, by mistake. That affidavit was rejected by the CJ. The party then sought to argue that Granger was not a proper party in the case. That too was rejected by the CJ.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Related

Previous Post

BREAKING NEWS!!! Dept. Supt., Deo Ruplall to head Police Finance Dept.

Next Post

Traffic rank hit by bitumen laden truck

Staff Reporter

Staff Reporter

Next Post
New Project T

Traffic rank hit by bitumen laden truck

Advertisements

  • WhatsApp Image at
  • WhatsApp Image at
  • WhatsApp Image at
  • WhatsApp Image at
Yokohama Logo
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Courts
  • International/Regional
  • Opinions
Call us: +592 645 5736

© 2021 Guyana Daily News

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Courts
  • International/Regional
  • Opinions

© 2021 Guyana Daily News

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Resize fonts
Enable contrast
Accessibility by WAH
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Courts
  • International/Regional
  • Opinions
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used.